MIRACULOUS MIRACLES™

Development, and How to Tell It From Corruption

A doctrine may grow as a body grows — it may not become a different body

Catholic teaching develops: the Church understands revelation more deeply over time. What she cannot do is reverse it. The test for telling one from the other is old, and it was given its classic form by a man the Church canonized in 2019.

What this page is

How to read this section

Not a case, but the tools for reading the cases: how to tell what binds you, and how to tell a genuine development from a reversal.

The record

What was actually said, when, and by whom — with the documents linked wherever a public text exists.

  1. 434

    St. Vincent of Lérins gives the rule that has governed the question ever since: doctrine may grow and advance, but only 'in its own kind — in the same doctrine, the same sense, and the same meaning.'

    Commonitorium 23
  2. 1845

    John Henry Newman publishes the Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine, setting out seven notes by which a true development may be told from a corruption. He was received into the Catholic Church while finishing it.

    An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine
  3. 1870

    Vatican I adopts Vincent's formula word for word: the meaning of the sacred dogmas is to be perpetually retained 'in the same sense and the same meaning'.

    Dei Filius, chapter 4, quoting Vincent of Lérins · read it
  4. 2005

    Benedict XVI names the two ways of reading the Church's history — a hermeneutic of rupture, and a hermeneutic of reform in continuity — and argues that only the second is true to what actually happened.

    Address to the Roman Curia, 22 December 2005 · read it
  5. 2019

    Newman is canonized. The Church's principal theorist of doctrinal development is now a saint.

    Canonization by Pope Francis, 13 October 2019

Newman's seven notes

Newman's problem was the one this whole section is about. He could see that the Church of the fourth century did not look like the Church of the first, and that the Church of the nineteenth looked like neither. Either Christianity had been corrupted, or it had developed — and if it had developed, there had to be a way of telling which was which. His answer was seven tests.

Preservation of type — the thing still has the same shape, as a grown man has the shape of the child. Continuity of principles — the same underlying convictions are still doing the work. Power of assimilation — it can absorb new material without being changed by it, as a living body digests food. Logical sequence — the later follows from the earlier, even if nobody drew the line at the time. Anticipation of its future — the seed of the later teaching is visible early. Conservative action upon its past — the development protects and confirms what went before rather than embarrassing it. Chronic vigour — it lasts; corruptions burn out.

The sixth is the one that does the most work in the cases that follow. A true development leaves the earlier teaching standing. A corruption requires you to say the Church was simply wrong before — and once you have said that of one teaching, you have said it in principle of all of them.

What development is not

It is not a licence. Vincent's formula has a hard edge in it: eodem sensu eademque sententia — the same sense and the same meaning. A development that requires the words to mean the opposite of what they meant is not a development.

Nor is it a claim that the Church has always understood everything she holds. She has not, and the record shows her arguing her way toward clarity, sometimes over centuries, sometimes badly. What is claimed is narrower and stranger: that in defining, she has never yet had to say that a previous definition was false.

What binds a Catholic today

  • ❦That the deposit of faith is closed with the death of the last apostle, and nothing new is revealed.
  • ❦That the Church's understanding of it genuinely grows.
  • ❦That a later definition may not contradict an earlier one — this is the limit the whole doctrine of development exists to protect.

Follow it further

Every citation on this page was checked against the document it names, and linked where a public text exists. Where Catholics of good faith genuinely disagree, the page says so rather than pretending the question is settled.